1a

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Incomplete, inaccurate, confusing history taking. Cannot get patient co-operation for examination, technique poor.

Clear history taking, appreciates the importance of clinical, psychological and social factors. Performs adequate and appropriate examinations.

Effective listener.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

1b

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Inappropriate, random, unnecessary investigations, no thought given. Often fails to perform investigations requested.

Investigates appropriately, ensures all investigations requested by the team are completed, knows what to do with abnormal results.

Arranges, completes and acts on investigations intelligently, economically and diligently.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

1c

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Unable to make decisions, or even make a working diagnosis. Fails to involve patients in decision making.

Can make a sound diagnosis, and produce safe, appropriate management plans. Involves patients in decision making.

Plus - shows intelligent interpretation of available data to form an effective hypothesis, understands the importance of probability in diagnosis.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

1d

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Poor, confusing records. Inadequate, illegible.

Clear records made in notes, medico-legally sound, others are able to understand.

Records his/her information accurately and efficiently. Easy for others to follow.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

1e

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Does not respond to emergency calls, chaos and panic in emergency situations.  Inability to do CPR and basic life support.

Responds quickly to emergency calls, works well within team, appropriate management of situation. Proficient in CPR and basic life support.

Shows ability in evaluating the emergency situation calmly and intelligently, establishes priorities correctly, organises assistance and treatment promptly.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

1f

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

No self-confidence, seeks help all the time, does not make any decisions. Over-confidence in ability, with no insight to a level that may harm patients. Unaware of own limits

Aware of own skill and competency level, seeks assistance appropriately.

An able doctor with a clear understanding of own competency, but still seeks advice when appropriate.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Does not see the need for learning, fails to keep up to date, does not learn from mistakes. No involvement in audit. Fixed blinkered approach. Poor attendance at teaching sessions. No use of IT.

Positive approach to learning, keeps up to date, participated in teaching, learns from mistakes. Involved in audit. >50% attendance at teaching sessions. Awareness of and can access electronic learning resources.

Enthusiastic approach to learning, Knowledgeable, reports own errors unhesitatingly and shows ability to learn from the experience. Actively involved in audit. Good (>75%) attendance at teaching sessions.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

3

Relationship with patients

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Discourteous, inconsiderate of patients views, dignity & privacy. Unable to reassure, subject of repeated complaints. Discriminates against patients with disability.

Courteous, polite, communicates well with patients, shows appropriate level of emotional involvement in the patient and family. Respects privacy & dignity.

Excellent bedside manner, able to anticipate patient’s emotional and physical needs and plans to meet them.  Explains clearly and checks understanding.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Unable / refuses to communicate with colleagues. Can’t work to common goal, selfish, inflexible.

Listens to colleagues– accepts the views of others. Flexible– ability to change in the face of valid argument.

Able to bring together views for a common goal. Team goal is put before personal agenda.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

No interest in teaching, mentoring and/or supervision of more junior doctors and medical students. Few teaching skills.

Beginning to develop teaching skills, supervising more junior doctors and medical students.

Actively involved in teaching, enthusiastic, able to motivate. Clear demonstration of teaching skills.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

6

Probity: Has a responsible and professional attitude and approach to their work, in the following areas: -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Fails to make care of patient first concern, own beliefs prejudice care, abuses position as a doctor.

Reasonable attitude / approach in above areas, a good doctor.

Excellent attitude / approach in above areas, a credit to the profession.  Patient care is the priority.

Score

Evidence

Mid-point Review

Final Review

7

The Educational Supervisor should try to refrain from adopting the role of the doctors General Practitioner.

Assessment

Concerns

Mid-point Review

Final Review